That's not a defect. That's a feature.

Apparently a creationist decided not to ignore the two creation accounts included in the the Book of Genesis, and built a new creationist theory out of it, declaring that there were two separate creations, in an attempt to work around geological evidence of the earth's extreme age and still stick with the recent arrival of humans.

Whoever has come up with this might have a decent career as a fantasist, but someone in the comments already blows it out of the water comparing the story to the Talmudic story.

I doubt if i could handle someone who actually believe that new, crazy theory, which actually sounds extremely familiar to me... it sounds like something out of the mouth of a certain zealot that i used to debate with at the university close to twenty years ago. Rationalizing the irrational can sometimes be a great spectator sport though.